POSITION
PAPER:
No to Mining in Rapu-Rapu by any individual nor mining company
The Institute for Environmental Conservation and Research (INECAR) maintains
its position on “no to mining in Rapu-Rapu by any individual nor
mining company” for the following reasons:
-
Rapu-Rapu
is an island ecosystem which has steep slopes, is located within a
typhoon path and has Type II climate: no dry season with very pronounce
wet period from November to January. Its steep slopes facilitate the
movement of contaminated water downhill towards the sea. Any pollutant
generated by mining operation will end up in Albay Gulf and surrounding
areas.
-
Its
largest and longest river is Binosawan River which is located near
the mining area. Mining activities uses a lot of fresh water, thus
will not only deplete this resource and deprive local communities
of their need for this limited resource, but also pollute scarce water
supply. There are three barangays in the immediate impact area: Malobago,
Pagcolbon and Binosawan.
-
The
island comprised of iron sulfide rocks capable of generating acid
mine drainage (AMD) when exposed to oxygen, water and sulfide bacteria.
There is no available remediation world wide in the present technology
(Environmental Management Council of British Columbia) since this
is only in the experimental stage. We must not allow the Philippines
to be the testing site considering the fragility of our island ecosystems.
AMD can go on and on for hundreds and thousands of years until all
sulfide rocks have been dissolved by acid.
-
AMD dissolves heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium and lead associated
with gold, silver, copper and zinc. These metals are carried by acidic
water into the sea and contaminate Albay Gulf and its fishery resources.
A brown seaweed (Padina sp.) has already shown high levels of arsenic
contamination (Regis, et al, 2001). These metals, once they have accumulated
above critical levels, can kill fishes and also cause human diseases
such as cancer, leukemia, mental disorder, bone deformation among
others.
-
Heavy
metals do not disappear even if acid water is neutralized (Jones,
1998). They are still deposited in surface soil and carried by water
into the sea when exposed and loosened by mining. Heavy metals transfer
from tiny plankton and aquatic plants to animals such as mollusks
and fishes through the food chain/pyramid where they are concentrated
in top carnivores. Examples are Tuna and Butanding. If this happens,
Some communities in Sorsogon and Camarines Sur will be contaminated
with heavy metals through the food chain. Organisms important to ecotourism
such as Butanding, a whale shark, will also be affected.
-
Rapu-Rapu
is part of the Marine Conservation Priority Areas selected by scientists
(Ong, Afuang and Rosell-Ambal, 2002). This project was proposed by
the DENR in 1997. The participating agencies are: Conservation International,
DENR-PAWB, BCP-UPCIDS and FPE. Partners and donors are PCARRD, ESSC,
WCSP. PNM, CABS, Haribon, PCAMRD, CEPF, USAID, ADB, UNDP, ARCBC, SIEMENS,
FPCI, FPHC and Intel Corp. Priority classification of this site and
its adjacent areas is extremely high. Indicators of the unique biodiversity
of Rapu-Rapu (Hixbar mining area) which might be very important in
the future is shown in the INECAR study (Regis, et al., 2001)
-
Rapu-Rapu
is also included in specific conservation priority areas for Reef
fishes and Conservation priority area for whale sharks, elasmobranchs,
and turtles. The participating agencies that determined these and
their donors are the same as those mentioned earlier.
-
Contrary
to claims of mining companies of uplifting poverty, mining can actually
cause poverty of local communities due to destruction of the environment
resulting to loss of productivity of agricultural land (Regis et al,
2001) and fisheries of aquatic/marine resources. One of the many examples
in the Philippines is Sta. Barbara just three kilometers from the
Lafayette mining site. The open pit of Hixbar mining company was abandoned
27 years ago, yet no vegetation has colonized the place to this day
due to heavy metal pollution and removal/erosion of whatever top soil
has started to develop.
-
The
tailings dam to be constructed by Lafayette has an impounding capacity
of 5 million metric tons. (ECC Provision No. 23) while the open pit
has the production capacity of one million metric tons per annum (ECC
Provision No. 2). However, only a small fraction of the precious metals
will be generated from the ores. Mine wastes include not only waste
rocks but also overburden soil and rocks. Lafayette is allowed to
mine the area with starting date of operation but no termination date.
Thus, tailings dam will overflow, including erosion of loosened overburden
rocks and soil adding to the contamination of Albay Gulf and some
parts of Lagonoy Gulf.
-
Contrary
to the claim of Mr. Watt of Lafayette that they have already answered
the issues I raised, this company was not able to answer the major
issues I pointed out: These are: a) iron sulfide rock that generates
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) since they could not even demonstrate how
to remediate AMD; b) rainy nature of the place aside from being within
a typhoon path that facilitates movement of pollutants towards the
sea; c) steep slopes that facilitates movement of water and erosion
of loosened soil during heavy rainfall; d) fragile island ecosystem
that houses rich biodiversity of terrestrial and aquatic/marine life;
e) contamination of Albay Gulf.
-
Mining
Ombudsman Annual Report 2001-2002 of Oxfam Community Aid Abroad based
in Victoria Australia specifically states Precautionary Principle
to include: “…mining of high sulfide ore-bodies should
only proceed if adequate steps have been taken to prevent acid mine
drainage, and if this is impossible, mining should not proceed, given
the permanent environmental implications” (p. 62).
-
Sustainable
development means “a development that meets the needs of the
present generation without compromising the ability of future generations
to also meet their needs” (Brundtland, 1987). Mining is extractive
and pollutive, thus, given the condition of Rapu-Rapu, there is no
way in which it can restore the productivity of the land and water
once it has started.
It is within this premise that the INECAR recommends no mining in
Rapu-Rapu by any individual nor mining company. The present condition
and capabilities of the mining company (Lafayette or others) cannot
warrant safe, clean and sustainable mining in island ecosystems.
Prepared by:
Emelina G. Regis, Ph.D.
Director
February 9, 2003
References:
- Brundtland Report
1987: “Our Common Future”. http://www.doc.mmu.ac.uk/arc/eae/Sustainability/Older/Bundtland_Report.html
- Environmental Compliance
Certificate (ECC) granted to Lafayette Philippines, Inc.
- Environmental Management
Council of British Columbia http://www/miningwatch.org/emcbc/library/amd_water.htm
- Jones, David.
1998. Treatment: Dealing with an Acid Problem. Australian Minerals and
Energy Environment Foundation.
- Mining Ombudsman
Annual Report 2001-2002 of Oxfam Community Aid Abroad based in Victoria
Australia
- Ong, Afuang and
Rosell-Ambal, 2002. Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priorities:
A second iteration of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action
Plan (NBSAP). DENR-PAWB, Conservation International Philippines, Biodiversity
Conservation Program (BCP)- UP Center for Integrative and Development
Studies (UPCIDS) and the Foundation for the Philippine Environment (FPE).
Quezon City, Philippines
- Regis, Emelina
G., Irma Medrano, Ma. Aurora Azurin-Conde and Melanio Regis. 2001. Some
Impacts of Mining on the Island Ecosystem of Rapu-Rapu, Province of
Albay. Gibon. Vol. 1 No. 1 pp. 43-77.
|